Category: Uncategorized

I appreciated how Limerick’s piece as well as Cronon et al’s piece did not simply bash on Turner’s frontier thesis, and rather understood him in his sociohistorical context. Turner clearly did not have a grip on what all was going on at the frontier and what had yet to come, he did point out a pattern and characterization of the Western frontier that summarized the collective feelings of his audience at the time.

This is the type of critique that I believe is beneficial. Seeing what’s missing from somebody else’s ideas and adding to it rather than rejecting it altogether. If we continue this cycle of critique, I believe that in a century we will still remember the ideas of FJT but start to see a much bigger picture that incorporates his frontier thesis.

Last year, I took a religious studies course called Spiritual Autobiographies with Jim Thrall. (Jim is incredible, and so was this class for multiple reasons.) One of the autobiographies we read for class was Black Elk Speaks by John Niehardt. The way this book was structured as well as its contents was really neat. I never knew how much of an emotional impact the increased interactions with white “Americans” had on Native Americans until I read this book. After reading this book, however, I found out that there were things left out of the book and others were edited to make them easier to understand for Neihardt’s readers. Do you think there are problems with this? If not, what would be the best (most ethical, most effective) way for people who are unfamiliar with Native American cultures to learn about them? Should we even try to learn the details of a culture that isn’t our own, especially one that has been ignored and forgotten and then appropriated by white America?

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!