Portrayal of Myths through Political Cartoons

Throughout the history of the United States, there has consistently been a definitive way to understand the perception of American Indians – political cartoons. This kind of popular media can inform a viewer of any era generally what stereotypes, perspectives, and myths are popular at any time that the political cartoons can be found.

One thing that is important to note about the portrayal of American Indians is that it did not seem to be intended to be accurate – rather, the illustrators portrayed American Indians in whatever way was convenient for them. Often, this meant making an association between American Indians and violence or savagery, as well as more abstract associations like wilderness and distinctness. Sometimes, however, American Indians were reduced to symbols of freedom and wilderness to idealized colonial American values.

On that note, here are six interesting political cartoons that portray Native Americans in some form. As students of American Indian history, we can use these images to analyze popular opinions of each time period and what those opinions might have meant for the Native Americans involved.

1774: “The able doctor, or, America swallowing the bitter draught.” Cartoon. Library of Congress. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/97514782/.

This is one of the cartoons we analyzed in class. This cartoon was published in London in 1774, and shows Lord North forcing tea representative of the Intolerable Acts down the throat of a representation of America; in this case, a partially uncovered Native American woman. In the background, France and Spain watch curiously, and Britannia – the representative for Britain – shields her eyes in shame. In this instance, Native American imagery is used to sympathize with colonists, using the ‘wild’ and ‘free’ symbolism that colonists in America tended to idealize.

1783: “Shelb—ns sacrifice / invented by Cruelty ; engraved by Dishonor.” Cartoon. Library of Congress. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2004673514/.

This political cartoon was originally published in London in 1783, at the official end of the American Revolution. It depicts a British man standing by and watching as American Indians kill Loyalists in America, with Britannia attacking the man. This cartoon makes enemies of Native Americans by depicting them as war-like killers who attack innocent people, calling it “a faithful representation of a Tragedy shortly to be performed on the Continent of America.” It turns Britons and Loyalists against American Indians.

1812: Charles, William. “A scene on the frontiers as practiced by the ‘humane’ British and their ‘worthy’ allies.” Cartoon. Library of Congress. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002708987/.

This political cartoon, originally published in Philadelphia in 1812 by illustrator William Charles, makes an enemy of American Indians. The cartoon was published during the War of 1812 between the United States and Britain, and some American Indian tribes sided with British troops, who, according to the cartoon, would offer rewards for a certain number of scalps of Patriot soldiers. In the title, Charles uses the word “worthy” to refer to Native Americans sarcastically, and directly calls for all “Columbia’s Sons” to fight back against them with a verse:

“Arise Columbia’s Sons and forward press, / Your Country’s wrongs call loudly for redress; / The Savage Indian with his Scalping knife, / Or Tomahawk may seek to take your life; / By bravery aw’d they’ll in a dreadful Fright, / Shrink back for Refuge to the Woods in Flight; / Their British leaders then will quickly shake, / And for those wrongs shall restitution make.”

The verse also reduces American Indians to war-like ‘savages’.

1886: “Historical caricature of the Cherokee nation.” Cartoon. Library of Congress. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2008661841/.

This political cartoon, published in 1886, is much more sympathetic to the American Indian experience than previous cartoons. It depicts white men tying down the Cherokee Nation and cutting his hair to shape him to their ways. Various things are written on the Cherokee Nation, representative of what’s affecting him, including railroads, lands in Alabama and Arkansas, U.S. marshals, and U.S. courts (which are the scissors cutting off his hair). In the background, there is the “National Cemetery.”

1894: Opper, Frederick. “Black Hawk War.” Cartoon. Indians of the Midwest. 2011. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://publications.newberry.org/indiansofthemidwest/indian-imagery/stereotypes/.

Not all were supportive of Native American rights in the late 19th century, though. This illustration comes from Frederick Opper in 1894. It was drawn for the book, History of the United States, written by Bill Nye, who was staunchly anti-Indian and who was very popular for this reason. This cartoon was drawn for the history of the Black Hawk War of 1832. Black Hawk is depicted as scalping a United States soldier, and “is caricatured to look both ridiculous and treacherous.”

1995: Branch, John. “You Don’t Look Like an Indian.” Cartoon. Indians of the Midwest. 2011. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://publications.newberry.org/indiansofthemidwest/indian-imagery/stereotypes/.

This political cartoon, illustrated by John Branch in 1995, delves into the centuries-old argument about whether or not someone is allowed to be Indian, based on stereotypes. In this cartoon, the stereotypes the boy is thinking of include imagery of Disney’s Pocahontas, a Washington Redskins helmet, the Cleveland Indians logo, a racing horse, and a cartoon of Native American with one feather in his hair. He doubts the girl is really American Indian because she doesn’t fit into the stereotypes.

These examples are not the only sources available that display perceptions of American Indians. If there are other political cartoons that are particularly useful for understanding myths about American Indians in the United States, please leave a link for the class to view them. Further, what other information can you glean from the sources that are here? What other myths are represented by these cartoons and by others?

Archiving part of our work

In many of my classes, students collaborate on making a bibliography that reflects their interests and the breadth of sources they have consulted in their work.  This is a place for those bibliographies to be archived in order that they may be useful to students in the future.

Many and varied ways to learn

There are a multiplicity of different digital tools that can help us process information and deepen our learning.   On this page you’ll find introductions to some of the tools I think might add to your learning experience and allow you to travel more thoughtfully and easily in our increasingly-connected world.

Digital is not inherently better than non-digital – but it is often newer to us, and requires an investment of time and energy to learn to use.  I hope this page will introduce you to some new tools, make that learning curve easier, and help you be able to make informed decisions about whether paper and pen, or a digital tool, is best suited to your learning needs.

Transparency

Welcome to a living archive of syllabi for my courses.   Here, you’ll find the detailed approaches to teaching that spring from my teaching philosophy.  All of my syllabi are works in progress, and I welcome your feedback on each.

Welcome to your blog!

This is a space for you to talk about the issues important to you.  Before you begin blogging, be sure you’ve done the following things:

  1. Told me what you want your screen name to be for this blog and received confirmation that I’ve created that identity for you
  2. Consulted with the class schedule to be sure which week you’re in charge of the blog and which weeks you’re a general participant.

Have fun here!